Quoi de neuf

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW INTERRATER RELIABILITY – BMJ

 What is already known on this topic

Social and private disability insurers use medical experts to evaluate claimants with impaired health to determine eligibility for disability benefits. Anecdotal evidence suggests that experts often disagree in their judgment of capacity to work when assessing the same claimant

What this study adds

This systematic review of 23 reproducibility studies from 12 countries shows a lack of good quality data applicable to the real world of disability assessment In most studies, medical experts reached only low to moderate reproducibility in their judgment of capacity to work.
Studies reported higher reproducibility when experts used a standardised evaluation procedure.These findings are disconcerting and call for substantial investment in research to improve assessment of disability

http://www.bmj.com/content/356/bmj.j14

______________________________________________________________

Gert Lindenger:’In some cases return to work is the treatment’.

Interview in TBV, The Netherlands

______________________________________________________________

Presentations of the Liège meeting February 2017

______________________________________________________________

Social Security In Greece

______________________________________________________________

Book of abstracts Ljubljana Congress June 2016